Skip to main content

Conservative Judaism's Problem? It's too Conservative.


When the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism recently announced its rebranding, affirming Conservative Judaism as “dynamic and authentic,” it had the potential to be a turning point for the movement. Its earlier tagline, “tradition and change,” not only was uninspiring, but also failed to capture the very humanity of our people’s search for meaning and connection at the heart of Judaism. This new phrase—more than just a word-shift—contained a message of a living breathing Judaism; for me, the phrase “dynamic and authentic” most closely expresses what I believe Judaism has been for centuries, and how the Conservative Movement can be the best resource we have to accessing Judaism’s dynamic rhythms, its authenticity of connection.
Not long after this step forward, however, the movement then reaffirmed its ban on intermarriage in a letter signed by all four major movement leaders. This letter wasn’t just a reaffirmation of its commitment to traditional Jewish law. For most non-Orthodox American Jews, it was a statement that the movement truly is conservative in all the ways we understand that word today. We live in a world of deep polarization that vastly transcends the political divide in this country. This is the age of culture wars, of two distinct moral narratives in this society, liberal and conservative, that are constantly in conflict. While the liberal narrative espouses values of egalitarianism and justice for the oppressed, the conservative one lifts up respect for authority and loyalty to traditional ways. Through its intermarriage letter, together with other approaches to issues of Jewish identity and continuity, the Conservative Movement affirmed its side in those culture wars.
The first problem with this choice is that the very signers of this letter themselves are not adherents to the cultural conservative narrative. Like most members of Conservative synagogues, they are “liberal Jews” in that they inhabit a narrative that celebrates Judaism’s insistence on social justice. Like all cultural liberals, they believe in social progress. They passionately long for a Judaism that evolves dynamically to meet changing circumstances. Nevertheless, the letter—and therefore the movement itself—reflect the wider American conservative narrative: a digging in of the heels in the face of a rapidly changing world, an insistence on loyalty to inherited ways and respect for the authority of power hierarchies, promoting ideals and traditions even when they disenfranchise or discriminate against individuals and groups.
This inability to reconcile the dissonance between the liberalism of Conservative _Jews_ and the conservatism of the movement’s stances is at the core of the movement’s decline in recent decades.
But it doesn’t have to be this way.
In all my years as a congregational Conservative rabbi, I taught a different narrative of my movement, one that I had learned at the Jewish Theological Seminary.
It’s a narrative that I believe lies at the core of what the movement was always about, but has failed to represent effectively in our time—namely, the dynamism and authenticity of our inherited tradition. Our movement can bring us to the bold and passionate ways that the ancient rabbis, most notably in the Talmud, fearlessly grappled with their changing world. Yes, their job was to “conserve” the traditions of their ancestors. But their primary goal was to translate that tradition into different forms and idioms over time—sometimes even abandoning time-cherished practices as circumstances required. The moral narrative of these ancient rabbis was not “conservative.” Quite the contrary, they were radicals. Revolutionaries. They did, indeed, conserve tradition. But for them, it wasn’t about tradition for tradition’s sake. Tradition was the God-given brushes, canvas and oils. Torah was the work of art itself. And, at the end of the day, the point of Torah is to connect human beings to God, to each other and to the world.
The Conservative Movement qua movement traces its roots to a reaction against the abandonment of tradition by the 19th-century Reform Movement. It represented an affirmation that tradition could indeed be lived, even in the modern world and embrace modern sensibilities. However, like all conservative movements, political or otherwise, the initial gesture of the movement, albeit justified, was reactive. In our time, reactive positions against the liberal mainstream’s notions of progress could be the movement’s fatal flaw.
These times represent a moment of reckoning for the movement.
Is it a movement that reacts against the excesses of progressivism, or is it a proactive force for confident, authentic progress in observant Judaism? The movement has always contained both energies.
But the time has come for the movement to choose a side. If the movement wishes to survive, it must choose the side of cultural progress. Asserting halakhic norms that the majority of American Jews cannot live by only communicates a movement desperately trying to self-preserve, rather than meet the needs of the Jewish people whom it serves. Bucking the universalist trend of social progressivism communicates a movement not only out of sync with its culturally liberal base, it is in fact also out of touch with the ancient rabbis’ forward-looking spirit.
The truly healthy path forward is for Conservative Jewish leadership to embrace the dynamic/authentic narrative of the movement, as opposed to an anxious fear-of-change narrative. The leadership should celebrate the dynamism and authenticity of our rabbinic heritage openly, loudly. This includes not only welcoming the possibility of recognizing intermarriage within a traditional framework, but also synagogue communities embracing more diverse members, pushing time-tested religious boundaries, and new ways for rabbis to wed traditions and modern sensibilities.
At the movement’s convention next month in Atlanta, the emphasis will be on renewal and innovation in Conservative Judaism.  (I will be leading the USCJ’s “Innovation Labs” project, which is designed to tackle these issues in the movement.) But unless the movement can address its conservative countervalence, those conversations are liable to prove ineffective.  Furthermore,   the term “innovation” itself is a misnomer. Judaism has always been essentially innovative, and the time has come to assert that any values-narrative that stands in the way of the progress of Torah from generation to generation is out of sync with who we are.
In the culture wars of our times, Jewish people time and again ask themselves, “Whose side of history do we want to be on?”
Like it or not, non-Orthodox Jews believe that the winning side of history lives in the liberal narrative of moral progress and social justice. Luckily for Conservative Judaism, the ancient rabbis lived by that same progressive narrative, and the name of that narrative is the Torah itself.
The Conservative Movement must overcome its own conservatism and inspire not just movement adherents, but all Jewish people to the dynamic and authentic force that rabbinic Judaism has always been. Only then can it be the true inheritor to the vision and genius of our ancient rabbinic forebears.

Rabbi Gil Steinlauf is the Senior Rabbinic Advisor at Adas Israel Congregation. He is also the co-creator of the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism’s “Innovation Labs” for Jewish Innovation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“We have Nothing to Fear”:  My speech on the future of Conservative Judaism at the USCJ Convention in Atlanta

The Importance of Keruv

I would like to teach us all a very important value in Jewish life known as Keruv.Keruv literally means ‘to bring close,’ ‘to draw near.’Throughout our history, the word “keruv” has meant the endeavor to bring close all those among are people who are, for whatever reason, feeling far away from the community.Keruv is a beautiful Jewish value that is all about welcoming.It’s the heart and soul of what has sustained us as a community for generations.The Jewish value of Keruv goes a long way back in Judaism. It seems that many of the great biblical figures were also especially concerned with Keruv. And their lives and stories teach us much about how to draw other people Karov, close to Judaism.
There was Aharon, the High Priest, the brother of Moses, for example. Our tradition tells us that he just had a magnificent talent for Keruv. When the Mishnah talks about Aharon, it says that he was Ohev Shalom v’Rodef Shalom, Oheiv et haBriot, umekarvan latorah: that he loved peace and pursued peac…

Yom Kippur 5773: HaMakom

​When Batya and I were first married, we drove across country, from California  (where we had been living for our rabbinic studies) back home to the East Coast.  We stopped on the way for a visit to the Grand Canyon.  There was a ticketing area that exited to a wooded pathway that led to the rim of the canyon.  As we started out on the path, cranky after hours in the car, we got into one of those typical first-year-of-marriage little spats; some disagreement over a petty issue--the kind of disagreements that couples who have been married a few years don’t have anymore.  She wanted to go camping and I wanted to stay in a hotel (I have long since learned, when my wife wants to go camping--we go camping!)  The argument didn’t end quickly.  It got more and more frustrating, and we decided to stop on the pathway and stand off to the side to see if we could just finish the discussion before continuing, so as not to spoil the whole visit.  Well, the argument just didn’t end as quickly as we …